If Ghost 11.x can read a GHO/GHS file created by Ghost 8.2, see what happens if you restore such a 8.2-created GHO file but use the 11.x client/virtual-partition thing to do it. And likewise when restoring using 11.02 or 11.5, the image file(s) you restored were created using those versions? Out of curiosity (I don't yet use Ghost 11.x so I don't know), are the image files you created made in their native version? So when you restored using Ghost 8.2, you were restoring a GHO file(s) created using 8.2. We have improved caching in 11.0 and perhaps this extra caching may affect older machines? You can always try running without cache and compare: -ws -wa etc. It is possible that some things may be slower (I dont expect 2-3 times), like for instance cloning FAT16 filesystem, which not many people care about. What filesystem are you cloning and what preOS are you comparing against - NTFS/FAT32/FAT16, DOS/Winpe/Linux etc? Are these old or new machines? As I said we do performance tests but generally from version to version and not from latest version to all previous versions. Instead of being proprietary it is pure zip archive that you can simply open and add more files as you please and then modify manifest file to reflect your changes. One-click VP is similar to Power Quest feature but is much more powerful. Can you shed any light on this? Thanks in advance.Ĭan you please post your question as a separate post on this forum because it has absolutely no relevance to the topic discussed here. I am using the same switches, computer, hard drives etc and have tried it on lots of different computers with the same results. When I use Ghost 11.02 or Ghost 11.5 to create/restore this backup it takes about 2 to 3 times longer than if I use Ghost 8.2. All of my resent tests have been using Symantec's one click virtual partition feature. I am please to see that in Ghost Console 2.5 boot wizard Symantec have brought back a feature that PowerQuest Deploy Centre used to have and that is the 'one click virtual partition' feature. I have recently tired to update this process so I am using Ghost 11.5 that comes as part of Ghost Console 2.5. This works very well and the performance obviously depends on the spec of the computer but it is quick. I am having the same problem I think? I have been using Ghost 8.2 to create and restore a local backup of the computer's o/s partition to an image file on to a 2nd partition on the same computer and hard drive by booting down to a virtual partition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |